ARCHIVES

1. Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22), 1074–1079. 2. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann. 3. Chao, K. P. (2024). Effects of information technology integrated into 5E inquiry instruction on the learning achievement and attitude of junior student in biology learning: Taking "immune system" as an example. Journal of Education Research, 38(2), 145–167. 4. Mehdi, B. (1973). Verbal and non-verbal test of creative thinking. National Psychological Corporation. 5. Nabie, A. (2025). Effects of teacher's use of 5E instructional model on secondary school student's achievement in biology in Vihiga County, Kenya. MMUST Institutional Repository. 6. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge. 7. Polanin, J. R., Austin, M., Taylor, J. A., Steingut, R. R., Rodgers, M. A., & Williams, R. (2024). Effects of the 5E instructional model: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241276191 8. Pravithalakshmi, P. (2010). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on creativity in Hindi at secondary level. Indian Educational Review, 48(1), 45–63. 9. Rajasree, R. (2013). Science creativity of students taught using McCormack and Yager Taxonomy and Bloom's Taxonomy. Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 112–125. 10. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.