editorinchief@ijrtmr.com +91 9840521421 Scholarly Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal e-ISSN 2583-0368 Since 2021
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2026
  4. Vol. 6 Issue 5
  5. Article
Review Article

Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Medical Diagnosis: A Modality-Wise Review of Clinical Records, Biosignals and Medical Images

  • Paper ID 496
  • Volume 6, Issue 5
  • Pages 425-429
  • Published Online: September-October 2026
Open Access Peer Reviewed Crossref DOI

Authors

  • Pankaj Kumar1
  • T. John Paul Antony2

1 Department of Information Science and Engineering, Acharya Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka India. 2 Department of Computer Science (Artificial Intelligence), The American College, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.

Article Information

Published Online
September-October 2026
Pages
425-429
Article Type
Review Article
Check for updates
check update

Abstract

View PDF

Machine learning now supports diagnosis in many clinical settings, from risk scores built on patient records to deep networks that read scans. The evidence, however, is split by data type. Studies on tabular records, biosignals and medical images use different models, different metrics and different validation practices, so it is hard to judge which approach suits a new diagnostic task. This paper reviews diagnostic learning across three data modalities: structured clinical and screening records, physiological signals collected by sensors and IoT devices, and medical images such as CT, MRI, X-ray, echocardiography and dermoscopy. It links each modality to the models that are reported to work best on it and to the practical problems that come with it. The review finds that feature selection combined with tree ensembles or hybrid classifiers performs well on structured records, that random forests and support vector machines remain strong on extracted signal features, and that convolutional networks and their ensembles lead on images. Across all three modalities, class imbalance, small single-centre datasets and limited explanation are recurring problems, and privacy rules restrict the pooling of data. Future work should report recall and calibration next to accuracy, test models on external sites, and adopt privacy-preserving training such as federated continual learning.

APC from ₹1200 + 18% GST

Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian (₹1400 with DOI)$80 USD internationalpaid after acceptance Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian$80 USD international ₹1200 Indian · $80 intl

  • CrossRef DOI
  • ISSN 2583-0368
  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Plagiarism Checked
  • Google Scholar
Submit Paper