Too Much Finance? Nonlinear Effects of Household and Corporate Credit on Economic Growth: Cross-Country Evidence

DOI

https://www.doi.org/10.59256/ijrtmr.20260605028

Published In

Volume 6, Issue 5 (2026)

Published Online

September-October 2026

Pages

255-264

Article Type

Original Article

Check for updates

This study tests whether the association between private credit and subsequent economic growth is nonlinear and whether the shape differs between household and non-financial corporate borrowing. A transparent availability rule yields an unbalanced annual panel of 28 economies. The data window is 1995–2019; the common one-year-lagged estimation sample contains 665 country-years over 1996–2019. Fourth-quarter total, household, and corporate credit-to-GDP ratios are BIS series preserved in the ALFRED vintage dated 30 April 2022. Growth and controls come from the IMF April 2022 World Economic Outlook archive. Two-way fixed-effects regressions use country-clustered standard errors. Quadratic optima are screened for statistical curvature, observed support, observations on both sides, and delta-method uncertainty; supplementary panel threshold regressions use a trimmed grid and a country-cluster wild bootstrap. The evidence does not identify an inverted-U relation. Total credit is negatively associated with next-year real GDP-per-capita growth in the linear model, while the quadratic term is positive and insignificant. Household credit has a significantly more negative linear association than corporate credit. The household quadratic is positive and its implied stationary point lies above support; corporate curvature is imprecise. Bootstrap threshold tests do not reject linearity at 5%. Thus credit composition is an important correlate of growth, but the data do not identify universal growth-maximizing credit thresholds. The results favor cautious macroprudential attention to household leverage and credit allocation, subject to endogeneity and cross-country heterogeneity.